The Case for Access International School

A few nights ago, my wife and I watched a movie on Amazon Prime called “The Promise.” It is a story about an Armenian doctor from Turkey and an American reporter who was covering the news in the region. Through their lives, the movie documents the horrific genocide of the Armenians of Turkey in a personal and heart-wrenching story.

Miriam-Webster dictionary defines ethnic cleansing as “the expulsion, imprisonment, or killing of an ethnic minority by a dominant majority in order to achieve ethnic homogeneity.” Genocide has its goal “the extermination of an ethnic group”, as such, it is an extreme form of ethnic cleansing.

The movie caused us to look further into the Armenian genocide, which is well summarized in the New Yok Times archive on this subject. According to the article, the Young Turk movement emerged as a result of a resurgence of Islamic religious sentiment. They gained control of the crumbling Ottoman Empire in 1908 and sided with Germany in WWI. The Armenians, who are Christians, sided with the Russians; a move that helped the Young Turks build a case against them and precipitated their genocide and expulsion from Turkey. 1.5 Million Armenians who were living in East Turkey were massacred. Rape, killing, and forced exodus to the Syrian desert without water or supplies, labeled “deportation” by the government, were the salient methods employed in the genocide. The Armenians who made it through the desert settled in different parts of Lebanon and Syria and formed communities that integrated well with local culture. Armenians in the Levant identify themselves as Syrian or Lebanese and are quite patriotic and involved in the political and social life of their new country. They are known for their skills in manufacturing and industry and are sought after for their good work ethic. They also guarded their Armenian culture, contributing beautifully to the cultural bouquet that is the Levant. We have many Armenian friends and co-workers in Lebanon and we often pray for them, for healing and freedom from the bondage that the genocide has brought upon them.

Unfortunately, from Old Testament times until now, ethnic cleansing and genocide have been a painful reality that has haunted every culture that became a majority in its area. Humans have collectively amassed a weight of shame that stains every conscience, yet at the same time, in every case of genocide, the perpetrators have always felt justified in their actions. This is certainly true in the ongoing worldwide genocide of unborn babies, a movement that is generally not recognized by many as genocidal but as “freedom of choice to take a life.” As I consider recorded history, I realize that every civilization was founded on the ashes of another and genocides were a recurring theme in the process.

In the last 100 years there have been 51 documented genocides worldwide, with a death toll of 58 Million people. With the exception of induced abortions, the Nazi holocaust against the Jews during WWII is probably the darkest, resulting in the deaths of over six million Jews.

Understanding the root cause of genocide and the human propensity for ethnic cleansing is elusive. Academia may site economics, security, and public opinion as the main forces that forge mass human behavior, but there is more to it than that. I believe that the human desire for “cleansing” goes beyond ethnicity and is founded in a deep sense of self-righteousness. Genocide is rooted in religion, the epitome of intolerance to anyone with a different faith. In the case of the Nazi holocaust, it was Christians killing Jews, but Christianity is not the only guilty religion. Every other religious group has its own history of atrocities, genocide, and ethnic cleansing.

Religion, the way I understand it, is an expression of a person’s deep conviction of self-righteousness, that one is favored for belonging to the right group and practicing the tenets it prescribes. This evolves into a convenient tool by which one can justify practically any behavior based on the circumstances of the moment. Being a human construct of thought and behavior, religion requires defense against those who would disprove its value or validity. There are many varieties of religions in the world, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Confucianism, and others, but there are also some more clandestine religions, not easily recognized as such, like atheism, secularism, conservatism, liberalism, and hedonism; yes, I believe these too are religions and they are the new nurseries of the “cleansing” instinct.

As far as I know, every religion demands proselytization, which makes coexistence of different religions itself a state of disobedience to religion. This is why zealot movements and awakenings spring up periodically throughout human history, peaking when one group becomes a majority over another, in an ongoing cycle of violence and enmity. The Islamic conquests and the Christian crusades are one such example, still perpetuated today in many conflicts all over the world, the Arab-Israeli being one of them.

As a Lebanese-American I have a cross-cultural life, directly sensing the opposing forces at work in my two cultures. Being attracted to each one separately I experience a mixed bag of love and disappointment in both. For my American culture, I have a deep love for the value it places on the individual and the inalienable rights of equality and all the freedoms that proceed from that core value. I also love the work ethic and the great generosity shown toward the needy and the stranger among us. But there are things I dislike about it too, such as the loneliness that people experience in this land of rugged individualism. There is also the seemingly blind adoration of organizational methods by which everything ticks toward an economic goal. The economic machine has a dehumanizing effect on the individual and can create a void in the hearts of people in this culture. I also find myself unable to justify parts of American history that are better left unmentioned, such as the plight of the American Indians in the last two centuries.

As for my Lebanese culture, I have a deep love for the security and belonging that come from the extended family. I also like how easy it is to make friends and develop life-long relationships. What I don’t like about my Lebanese culture is the deep-rooted sectarianism that builds insurmountable walls between people groups, and conscripts the individual to serve within the confines of their own people. It can be suffocating. I am also very disappointed in how much hatred our culture can cling on to over many centuries, preventing any prospect of real unity without tyrannical rule. I have noticed that the strengths of a culture are its weaknesses too.

As a result of my study of the Bible and my experience in different cultures, I have grown to believe that all cultures are thoroughly and intrinsically defective. My formal education teaches that culture itself is neither right nor wrong, but I seriously doubt that claim. Humans have all delved deeply into the darkness of genocide and self-righteousness, and these have manifested in every culture; therefore, since cultures are the emergence of behavior of humans, they will certainly reflect the sin in them as well. Culture is the result of acceptable and normal behavior over time and it cannot be separated or exonerated from our collective sin. I have looked for the “correct” culture but I cannot find it, yet, to say that it does not exist is a perpetuation of the denial of our collective shame and is enabling the next “justified cleansing.”

With this essay, I am sure I have managed to offend both of my cultures and have given them ample reason to reject me and my perspective. But it was never my intent to offend or attack either one, because my love for both is genuine and I don’t advocate a cynical attitude toward either one. I am writing this essay because I have found a hope.

I believe that we have one hope for deliverance from the shame of our history of genocide and self-righteousness. It is the Kingdom of God through the Gospel of Jesus Christ. As I read it in the Bible, the Kingdom of God is not a religion at all. In fact, it was first proclaimed in Jerusalem two thousand years ago, as a rebuke and a condemnation of the religious institutions of the time, which recognized it as a great threat to their very existence and have been trying to extinguish it ever since (Matthew 23:13-39).

Considering that the ultimate goal of the Gospel is the revelation of the righteousness of God (Romans 1:17) , religion has undertaken to corrupt and mask it in an unholy mixture of pious legalism (2 Timothy 3:1-5). For millennia, religions have come against the Kingdom of God, unsuccessfully attempting to contain, isolate, and extinguish the Gospel of Jesus Christ. It is preached in the context of great hostility and resistance against the true revelation of God; cultures are not neutral but vehemently resistant to it.

In the Middle East, sectarian lines have been drawn and a seemingly cordial but cold co-existence covers a dark hatred for each other lurking underneath. Hostility is pressurized and ready to explode at the slightest imbalance or ripple in the political landscape. Like vicious wolves unleashed, majority sects of the Middle East have devoured the minorities around them and have morphed into geographical blocks of conforming ethnicities. Jews together, Sunnis together, Shia together, and minorities sprinkled in between. Christianity has been practically expelled from the region which has become fortified against outside cultures and religions and it is very resistant to the Gospel.

In this context, and in the face of impossible hostility and enmity, the Gospel has been whole-heartedly and openly received by the Druze of Lebanon and Syria. It grew from within the culture, not as a foreign intrusion, but as an answer to the hopes and aspirations of the Druze themselves, to know God personally and to make Him known. They have come to see the Bible as their book and their walk with God is the natural outcome of their standing as children in the Household of God. They have established a transformed community called the Lord’s Family and Access International School. This expression of the Gospel is a radical departure from religion, and as more and more people seek to flee the grasp of religion’s enslavement, they can be guided by it to find refuge in the Kingdom of God. Within the fortified walls of the non-Christian communities of Lebanon and Syria, Access International School is a place of refuge for those seeking the Kingdom of God; it is, at the least, one small place where captives are set free from sin and darkness, from the genocidal history, and the self-righteousness of religion.

4 thoughts on “The Case for Access International School”

  1. Thank you for the thought provoking essay. While sin runs rampant throughout our race, defining our respective cultures, Jesus’ declaration remains: “the gates of hell will not prevail against it (His church)”.

    Thank you for expending your life making Him known.

  2. Helpful, Rabih, & reminds me of tribalism. Salon Munster, founder of Musalaha whose mission is to reconcile Palestinian & Israeli believers pointed out we have 2 tribes in America: Democrats & Republicans

  3. So well thought out and precise as only a man of your background can fully understand and share. What a blessing to have you standing for and serving the Kingdom of God, the only true answer to the completeness we all desire, Thank you for sharing these thoughts. I agree and want everyone to read and understand that the only way is through our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. Nothing is impossible with Him!
    God Bless you as we Bless Him

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *